Multi-criteria assessment of carbon fiber reinforced filaments: Effect of infill pattern on mechanical, surface, and environmental metrics

dc.contributor.authorVural, Erdinc
dc.contributor.authorUlkir, Osman
dc.contributor.authorAydin, Erman
dc.contributor.authorOzer, Salih
dc.date.accessioned2026-07-13T12:18:04Z
dc.date.issued2026
dc.departmentMuş Alparslan Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractCarbon fiber (Cf) reinforced filaments are increasingly used in fused deposition modeling (FDM) to produce functional components. However, selecting an appropriate material-infill combination remains challenging because mechanical performance, surface quality, and environmental burden do not improve simultaneously. This study presents a multi-criteria performance assessment of Cf reinforced filaments by quantifying the influence of infill pattern on overall behavior. These filaments are PC/Cf, PA12/Cf, PETG/Cf, and PPS/Cf. Six infill patterns (Grid, Honeycomb, Triangular, Gyroid, Concentric, and Cubic) were investigated. Tensile strength, flexural strength, surface roughness, and carbon emissions were evaluated jointly through min-max normalization and equal-weight aggregation to rank all material-infill combinations. In parallel, an undirected principal component analysis (PCA) was conducted on standardized raw variables to explore intrinsic multivariate relationships without reversing cost criteria. The trade-off ranking identified PC/Cf-Concentric as the optimum overall configuration with an overall score of 0.775, reflecting the most balanced compromise among the four metrics. The highest mechanical performance was achieved by PPS/Cf-Concentric, reaching 76.32 MPa in tensile strength and 98.95 MPa in flexural strength, while also providing the lowest measured surface roughness (Ra = 8.25 & micro;m). However, this configuration exhibited the highest carbon burden (197.63 g CO2-eq), evidencing a clear performance-sustainability conflict. The minimum carbon emission was obtained for PC/Cf-Grid (131.75 g CO2-eq). PCA indicated that the global variability is strongly material-driven, with PC1 and PC2 explaining 79.2% and 19.3% of the total variance, while infill architecture acts as a secondary modifier that shifts the balance among mechanical, surface, and environmental metrics. The combined ranking-PCA framework offers a transparent route for selecting Cf reinforced filament-infill configurations when both performance and sustainability are considered.
dc.description.sponsorshipAydimath;n Adnan Menderes University Scientific Research Projects Coordination Unit [AYMYO-26001] -- The authors disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This study was funded by the Ayd & imath;n Adnan Menderes University Scientific Research Projects Coordination Unit under Project Number AYMYO-26001.
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/08927057261453895
dc.identifier.issn0892-7057
dc.identifier.issn1530-7980
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-6968-8734
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-9568-1966
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105038990765
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1177/08927057261453895
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12639/8784
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001768150200001
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSage Publications Ltd
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Thermoplastic Composite Materials
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.snmzKA_WOS_20250701
dc.subjectFused Deposition Modeling
dc.subjectCarbon Fiber Reinforced Filament
dc.subjectInfill Pattern
dc.subjectCarbon Emissions
dc.subjectMulti-Criteria Decision-Making
dc.subjectPrincipal Component Analysis
dc.titleMulti-criteria assessment of carbon fiber reinforced filaments: Effect of infill pattern on mechanical, surface, and environmental metrics
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar