Multi-criteria assessment of carbon fiber reinforced filaments: Effect of infill pattern on mechanical, surface, and environmental metrics

Yükleniyor...
Küçük Resim

Tarih

Dergi Başlığı

Dergi ISSN

Cilt Başlığı

Yayıncı

Sage Publications Ltd

Erişim Hakkı

info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess

Özet

Carbon fiber (Cf) reinforced filaments are increasingly used in fused deposition modeling (FDM) to produce functional components. However, selecting an appropriate material-infill combination remains challenging because mechanical performance, surface quality, and environmental burden do not improve simultaneously. This study presents a multi-criteria performance assessment of Cf reinforced filaments by quantifying the influence of infill pattern on overall behavior. These filaments are PC/Cf, PA12/Cf, PETG/Cf, and PPS/Cf. Six infill patterns (Grid, Honeycomb, Triangular, Gyroid, Concentric, and Cubic) were investigated. Tensile strength, flexural strength, surface roughness, and carbon emissions were evaluated jointly through min-max normalization and equal-weight aggregation to rank all material-infill combinations. In parallel, an undirected principal component analysis (PCA) was conducted on standardized raw variables to explore intrinsic multivariate relationships without reversing cost criteria. The trade-off ranking identified PC/Cf-Concentric as the optimum overall configuration with an overall score of 0.775, reflecting the most balanced compromise among the four metrics. The highest mechanical performance was achieved by PPS/Cf-Concentric, reaching 76.32 MPa in tensile strength and 98.95 MPa in flexural strength, while also providing the lowest measured surface roughness (Ra = 8.25 & micro;m). However, this configuration exhibited the highest carbon burden (197.63 g CO2-eq), evidencing a clear performance-sustainability conflict. The minimum carbon emission was obtained for PC/Cf-Grid (131.75 g CO2-eq). PCA indicated that the global variability is strongly material-driven, with PC1 and PC2 explaining 79.2% and 19.3% of the total variance, while infill architecture acts as a secondary modifier that shifts the balance among mechanical, surface, and environmental metrics. The combined ranking-PCA framework offers a transparent route for selecting Cf reinforced filament-infill configurations when both performance and sustainability are considered.

Açıklama

Anahtar Kelimeler

Fused Deposition Modeling, Carbon Fiber Reinforced Filament, Infill Pattern, Carbon Emissions, Multi-Criteria Decision-Making, Principal Component Analysis

Kaynak

Journal of Thermoplastic Composite Materials

WoS Q Değeri

Scopus Q Değeri

Cilt

Sayı

Künye

Onay

İnceleme

Ekleyen

Referans Veren