Hybrid Experimental–Machine Learning Study on the Mechanical Behavior of Polymer Composite Structures Fabricated via FDM

dc.contributor.authorÜlkir, Osman
dc.contributor.authorErsoy, Sezgin
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-03T08:55:51Z
dc.date.available2025-10-03T08:55:51Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.departmentMuş Alparslan Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractThis study explores the mechanical behavior of polymer and composite specimens fabricated using fused deposition modeling (FDM), focusing on three material configurations: acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS), carbon fiber-reinforced polyphthalamide (PPA/Cf), and a sandwich-structured composite. A systematic experimental plan was developed using the Box–Behnken design (BBD) to investigate the effects of material type (MT), infill pattern (IP), and printing direction (PD) on tensile and flexural strength. Experimental results showed that the PPA/Cf material with a “Cross” IP printed “Flat” yielded the highest mechanical performance, achieving a tensile strength of 75.8 MPa and a flexural strength of 102.3 MPa. In contrast, the lowest values were observed in ABS parts with a “Grid” pattern and “Upright” orientation, recording 37.8 MPa tensile and 49.5 MPa flexural strength. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) results confirmed that all three factors significantly influenced both outputs (p < 0.001), with MT being the most dominant factor. Machine learning (ML) algorithms, Bayesian linear regression (BLR), and Gaussian process regression (GPR) were employed to predict mechanical performance. GPR achieved the best overall accuracy with R2 = 0.9935 and MAPE = 11.14% for tensile strength and R2 = 0.9925 and MAPE = 12.96% for flexural strength. Comparatively, the traditional BBD yielded slightly lower performance with MAPE = 13.02% and R2 = 0.9895 for tensile strength. Validation tests conducted on three unseen configurations clearly demonstrated the generalization capability of the models. Based on actual vs. predicted values, the GPR yielded the lowest average prediction errors, with MAPE values of 0.54% for tensile and 0.45% for flexural strength. In comparison, BLR achieved 0.79% and 0.60%, while BBD showed significantly higher errors at 1.76% and 1.32%, respectively. © 2025 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/polym17152012
dc.identifier.issn2073-4360
dc.identifier.issue15en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105013167137
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.3390/polym17152012
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12639/7371
dc.identifier.volume17en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherMultidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)en_US
dc.relation.ispartofPolymersen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.snmzKA_Scopus_20251003
dc.subjectAdditive Manufacturingen_US
dc.subjectFused Deposition Modelingen_US
dc.subjectMachine Learningen_US
dc.subjectMechanical Behavioren_US
dc.subjectPolymer Compositeen_US
dc.subjectAnalysis Of Variance (anova)en_US
dc.subjectComposite Materialsen_US
dc.subjectComposite Structuresen_US
dc.subjectDepositionen_US
dc.subjectFabricationen_US
dc.subjectMachine Learningen_US
dc.subjectStructural Designen_US
dc.subjectStyreneen_US
dc.subjectTensile Strengthen_US
dc.subjectAcrylonitrile-butadiene-styreneen_US
dc.subjectBayesianen_US
dc.subjectBox-behnken Designen_US
dc.subjectDeposition Modelingen_US
dc.subjectGaussian Process Regressionen_US
dc.subjectMachine-learningen_US
dc.subjectMaterial's Typeen_US
dc.subjectMechanical Behavioren_US
dc.subjectMechanical Performanceen_US
dc.subjectPolymer Compositeen_US
dc.subjectBending Strengthen_US
dc.titleHybrid Experimental–Machine Learning Study on the Mechanical Behavior of Polymer Composite Structures Fabricated via FDMen_US
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket

Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Yükleniyor...
Küçük Resim
İsim:
7371.pdf
Boyut:
1.95 MB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Tam Metin / Full Text