Drying kinetics, total bioactive compounds, antioxidant activity, phenolic profile, lycopene and ?-carotene content and color quality of Rosehip dehydrated by different methods

dc.authorscopusid57406886000
dc.authorscopusid57194286866
dc.authorscopusid57023633500
dc.authorscopusid56437916600
dc.authorscopusid6701802186
dc.authorscopusid56313329900
dc.contributor.authorGoztepe, B.
dc.contributor.authorKayacan, S.
dc.contributor.authorBozkurt, F.
dc.contributor.authorTomas, M.
dc.contributor.authorSagdic, O.
dc.contributor.authorKarasu, S.
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-27T16:56:47Z
dc.date.available2022-01-27T16:56:47Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.description.abstractThis study aimed to determine the effect of different drying methods namely, hot air drying (HAD), freeze-drying (FD), vacuum drying (VD), and ultrasound-assisted vacuum drying (USVD) on drying kinetic, total bioactive compounds, lycopene and ?-carotene, phenolic composition and color quality of rosehip. Drying times of the rosehips for USVD, VD, and HAD were 180, 300, and 1140 min, respectively, indicating that USVD significantly reduced drying time of rosehip. The results of total bioactive compounds, lycopene and ?-carotene, phenolic composition showed that FD resulted the highest bioactive compounds, followed by VD, USVD, and HAD. DPPH and CUPRAC results showed that FD dried samples showed highest antioxidant activity than fresh and all dried samples while HAD showed lowest antioxidant activity. USVD and FD exhibited a lower ?E value than HAD and VD, indicating that they had similar color properties to the fresh sample. USVD resulted in lower drying time and color change than VD and HAD, while USVD showed lower bioactive compounds retention than VD. This study suggested that USVD could be used as an alternative to HAD due to its lower drying time and higher bioactive compound and color retention than HAD. © 2021 Elsevier Ltden_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.lwt.2021.112476
dc.identifier.issn0023-6438
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85122590961
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2021.112476
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12639/4138
dc.identifier.volume153en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000702766400008
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherAcademic Pressen_US
dc.relation.ispartofLWTen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectCarotenoidsen_US
dc.subjectCUPRACen_US
dc.subjectPhenolic profileen_US
dc.subjectUltrasound assisted vacuum dryingen_US
dc.subjectAntioxidantsen_US
dc.subjectColoren_US
dc.subjectFinite difference methoden_US
dc.subjectUltrasonicsen_US
dc.subjectAntioxidant activitiesen_US
dc.subjectBioactive compoundsen_US
dc.subjectCUPRACen_US
dc.subjectDrying timeen_US
dc.subjectFreeze dryingen_US
dc.subjectHot air dryingen_US
dc.subjectPhenolic profilesen_US
dc.subjectRosehipen_US
dc.subjectUltrasound assisted vacuum dryingen_US
dc.subjectVacuum dryingen_US
dc.subjectCarotenoidsen_US
dc.titleDrying kinetics, total bioactive compounds, antioxidant activity, phenolic profile, lycopene and ?-carotene content and color quality of Rosehip dehydrated by different methodsen_US
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket

Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Yükleniyor...
Küçük Resim
İsim:
4138.pdf
Boyut:
3.99 MB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Tam Metin / Full Text