Are lipid-lowering therapies used according to the guidelines?: A real-world retrospective study of 1001 patients with type 2 diabetes

dc.contributor.authorSahin, Muhammet Fatih
dc.contributor.authorErol, Ali
dc.contributor.authorBayrak, Gokhan
dc.contributor.authorSahin, Ali
dc.date.accessioned2026-07-13T12:18:05Z
dc.date.issued2026
dc.departmentMuş Alparslan Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractType 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is frequently complicated by dyslipidemia, which increases the cardiovascular risk. Although guidelines strongly recommend lipid-lowering therapy, real-world treatment thresholds and adherence remain inconsistent in the literature. This retrospective observational study included 1001 patients with T2DM who attended outpatient clinics between March 2024 and March 2025. Demographic characteristics, metabolic parameters, and medication use (statins, fibrates, insulin, and neuropathy drugs) were retrieved from the hospital records. Group comparisons were performed using parametric and nonparametric tests, and multivariate logistic regression was used to identify the independent predictors of drug use. The mean age of the cohort was 60.9 +/- 11.4 years, and 57.1% of the patients were female. The mean HbA1c was 7.47 +/- 1.56%, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) was 110.7 +/- 42.8 mg/dL, high-density lipoprotein was 49.6 +/- 14.0 mg/dL, and triglycerides (TG) were 172.7 +/- 100.1 mg/dL. Statin users had higher LDL and high-density lipoprotein levels but lower TG levels than nonusers. Fenofibrate users exhibited markedly higher TG levels. Insulin therapy was associated with poorer glycemic control but did not significantly affect the lipid parameters. In logistic regression, statin use was independently predicted by higher HbA1c and LDL levels, whereas fibrate use was predicted by elevated TG levels. Age was the only independent predictor of neuropathic drug use. In this real-world T2DM cohort, the initiation of statins and fibrates did not align with guideline-based thresholds. Statins were prescribed at higher LDL levels, whereas fibrates were reserved for patients with severely elevated TG levels. These findings highlight the persistent gap between guidelines and clinical practice and emphasize the need for strategies to improve lipid management in secondary-care settings.
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/MD.0000000000047360
dc.identifier.issn0025-7974
dc.identifier.issn1536-5964
dc.identifier.issue4
dc.identifier.pmid41578556
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105028457328
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000047360
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12639/8802
dc.identifier.volume105
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001679682400002
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherLippincott Williams & Wilkins
dc.relation.ispartofMedicine
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.snmzKA_WOS_20250701
dc.subjectDiabetes Mellitus
dc.subjectDiabetic Neuropathy
dc.subjectDyslipidemias
dc.subjectFibrates
dc.subjectHydroxymethylglutaryl-Coa Reductase Inhibitors
dc.subjectHypolipidemic Agents
dc.subjectType 2
dc.titleAre lipid-lowering therapies used according to the guidelines?: A real-world retrospective study of 1001 patients with type 2 diabetes
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar