Histopathological examination of the effectiveness of nonvascularized tibia and femur bone allografts on bone healing in rat tibia fractures

dc.contributor.authorKarabulut, Burak
dc.contributor.authorTanrisever, Murat
dc.contributor.authorDogan, Delil
dc.contributor.authorGelic, Turker
dc.contributor.authorOzcan, Erhan Cahit
dc.contributor.authorIstek, Ozmen
dc.contributor.authorDundar, Serkan
dc.date.accessioned2026-07-13T12:17:45Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.departmentMuş Alparslan Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study was to histologically evaluate the healing processes of tibia fractures reconstructed with allogeneic bone grafts taken from different anatomical regions (tibia and femur). Twenty-five Sprague-Dawley rats were used in the study. The rats were divided into four groups: fracture control (n = 7), tibia allogeneic bone transplant (n = 7), femur allogeneic bone transplant (n = 7), and donor group (n = 4). Corticocancellous bone blocks (5 & times;5 mm) taken from the donor animals were fixed to the fracture sites created in the tibias of recipient rats with Kirschner wires. At the end of the 4-week healing period, the rats were sacrificed, and the tibias were examined histologically. Tissue samples were fixed in 10 % neutral formalin and decalcified, then embedded in paraffin and stained with hematoxylin-eosin. The new bone formation rate was assessed histomorphometrically and analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis test. Callus formation was observed at the fracture line in all groups. Callus tissue was more uniform and new bone formation was more dense in the tibia and femur allogeneic transplant groups. The highest new bone formation was observed in the tibia and femur allogeneic bone transplant group when compared with controls (P < 0,05 P = 0.002). Non vascular allogeneic bone transplantation; tibia and femur derived grafts, was found to significantly increase fracture healing compared to the control group. It was concluded that the use of allogeneic bone obtained from different anatomic sites may be an effective and biocompatible option for bone regeneration.
dc.identifier.doi10.52973/rcfcv-e362861
dc.identifier.issn0798-2259
dc.identifier.issue2
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ4
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.52973/rcfcv-e362861
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12639/8680
dc.identifier.volume36
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001705629800001
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherUniv Zulia, Facultad Ciencias Veterinarias
dc.relation.ispartofRevista Cientifica-Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.snmzKA_WOS_20250701
dc.subjectTibia Fracture
dc.subjectAllogeneic Bone Graft
dc.subjectFemur
dc.subjectTibia
dc.subjectBone Healing
dc.subjectRat
dc.titleHistopathological examination of the effectiveness of nonvascularized tibia and femur bone allografts on bone healing in rat tibia fractures
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar