Assessment of Contamination Risk from Fecal Matter Presence on Fruit and Mulch in the tomato fields based on generic Escherichia coli population
| dc.authorscopusid | 57190438231 | |
| dc.authorscopusid | 8726683500 | |
| dc.contributor.author | Topalcengiz, Z. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Danyluk, M.D. | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-01-27T16:56:46Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2022-01-27T16:56:46Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2022 | |
| dc.description.abstract | The purpose of this study was to evaluate the fate of generic Escherichia coli in fecal pats under different field conditions and to predict Salmonella and Shiga toxin-producing E. coli (STEC) survival dynamics based on developed models. Eight trials were conducted during spring and fall in both North and Central Florida. Fresh cattle feces (1g) was placed on mature green round tomatoes located inside (TIP) and outside (TOP) of the plant canopy. Fecal pats (10 g) were placed under (MUP) and distant (MDP) to tomato plants on plastic mulch. Pathogen populations were predicted based on developed models. Declines in generic E. coli populations over 7 days (Log CFU/g) in fecal pats were between 0.9 and 2.7 on TIP, 1.2 and 3.0 on TOP, 0.2 and 1.2 on MUP, and 0.4 and 1.5 on MDP in the Central Florida fall and spring trials, respectively. E. coli populations remained stable at ?4.2 and ? 6.5 Log CFU/g during all North Florida trials. The concentration changes in predicted Salmonella and STEC population were less than 2.1 Log CFU/g in fecal pats for all conditions. Developed models predicted similar pathogen survival trends to generic E. coli with no dramatical impact under the field conditions. © 2021 Elsevier Ltd | en_US |
| dc.description.sponsorship | U.S. Department of Agriculture, USDA: SCRI-2011-51181-30767; National Institute of Food and Agriculture, NIFA; Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida, IFAS | en_US |
| dc.description.sponsorship | This material is based upon work that is supported by the National Institute of Food and Agriculture, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Specialty Crops Research Initiative (SCRI), under awards SCRI-2011-51181-30767. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the view of the U.S. Department of Agriculture. The authors thank to the staff at the two different field sites at the University of Florida's Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences (UF/IFAS) Gulf Coast Research and Education Center located in Wimauma, Florida (Central Florida) and the North Florida Suwannee Research and Education Center ? Suwannee Valley in Live Oak, Florida. The authors also thank Travis Chapin, Loretta Friedrich, Gwen Lundy, Luis Edgardo Martinez, and Gonca Buyruko?lu for technical support. | en_US |
| dc.description.sponsorship | This material is based upon work that is supported by the National Institute of Food and Agriculture, U.S. Department of Agriculture , Specialty Crops Research Initiative (SCRI), under awards SCRI-2011-51181-30767 . Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the view of the U.S. Department of Agriculture. The authors thank to the staff at the two different field sites at the University of Florida's Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences (UF/IFAS) Gulf Coast Research and Education Center located in Wimauma, Florida (Central Florida) and the North Florida Suwannee Research and Education Center – Suwannee Valley in Live Oak, Florida. The authors also thank Travis Chapin, Loretta Friedrich, Gwen Lundy, Luis Edgardo Martinez, and Gonca Buyrukoğlu for technical support. | en_US |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.fm.2021.103956 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0740-0020 | |
| dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85120852650 | |
| dc.identifier.scopusquality | Q1 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2021.103956 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12639/4132 | |
| dc.identifier.volume | 103 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.wos | WOS:000751264000004 | |
| dc.identifier.wosquality | Q1 | |
| dc.indekslendigikaynak | Web of Science | |
| dc.indekslendigikaynak | Scopus | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.publisher | Academic Press | en_US |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Food Microbiology | en_US |
| dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |
| dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess | en_US |
| dc.subject | Animal intrusion | en_US |
| dc.subject | Feral pig | en_US |
| dc.subject | Salmonella | en_US |
| dc.subject | Seasonality | en_US |
| dc.subject | STEC | en_US |
| dc.subject | Survival | en_US |
| dc.title | Assessment of Contamination Risk from Fecal Matter Presence on Fruit and Mulch in the tomato fields based on generic Escherichia coli population | en_US |
| dc.type | Article |
Dosyalar
Orijinal paket
1 - 1 / 1
Yükleniyor...
- İsim:
- 4132.pdf
- Boyut:
- 4.37 MB
- Biçim:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
- Açıklama:
- Tam Metin / Full Text










